“A work of art is an object that necessitates contemplation”. Latency of visual studies within the Vienna School of Art History?
2020, 30
Data publikacji
Model publikowania
Rodzaj licencji
Dziedzina
Dyscyplina
Język publikacji
Pliki do pobrania
PDF 207 KB
Liczba wyświetleń:185
Liczba pobrań:39
Cytowania Crossref:0
Wynik Altmetric:0
Abstrakt
This article investigates a research method of the so-called Vienna School of Art History, mainly its transformation by Max Dvořák around the First World War. The article suggests the possible influence of Georg Simmel’s philosophy on Dvořák in this time, evident mainly in Dvořák’s interpretation of Pieter Bruegel the Elder’s art, written by Dvořák in 1920 and published posthumously in 1921. This another view on the Vienna School of Art History is then researched in writings on Pieter Bruegel the Elder by Dvořák’s students Hans Sedlmayr and Charles de Tolnay when Tolnay extended Dvořák’s thinking and Sedlmayr challenged its premises – both Tolnay and Sedlmayr thus in the same time interpreted Bruegel’s art differently, even though they were both Dvořák’s students. The article then suggests a possible interpretative relationship of the Vienna School of Art History after its transformation by Max Dvořák with today’s approaches to art (history), mainly with the so-called visual studies.
Słowa kluczowe:
Bibliografia
Aurenhammer, H., "Inventing 'Mannerist Expressionism': Max Dvořák and the History of Art as History of the Spirit", in: K. A. Smith, ed., The Expressionist Turn in Art History. A Critical Anthology, Burlington, 2014, pp. 187-208.
Aurenhammer, H., "Max Dvořák. Tintoretto und die Moderne", Wiener Jahrbuch für Kunstgeschichte, no. 49, 1996,pp. 9-39.
https://doi.org/10.7767/wjk-1996-0103
Bakoš, J., "Max Dvořák - a neglected re-visionist", Wiener Jahrbuch für Kunstgeschichte, no. 53, 2004,pp. 55-72.
https://doi.org/10.7767/wjk.2004.53.1.55
Bakoš, J., Discourses and Strategies: the role of the Vienna School in shaping Central European approaches to art history and related discourses, Frankfurt am Main, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-03167-6
Bałus, W., "Max Dvořák bettrachtet Tintoretto oder über den Manierismus", Ars, no. 44, 2011, pp. 26-43.
Belting, H., Das Ende der Kunstgeschichte? München, 1984.
Betthausen, P., Feist, P. H., Fork, Ch., eds., Metzler Kuntshistoriker Lexikon, 2. Auflage, Stuttgart - Weimar, 2007.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05262-9
Bredekamp, H., "Bildwissenschaft", in: Metzler Lexikon Kunstwissenschaft, 2. Auflage, ed. U. Pfisterer, Stuttgart, 2011, pp. 72-75.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-00331-7_24
Bredekamp, H., Der Bildakt, Berlin, 2015.
Danto, A., "The End of Art", in: B. Lang, ed., The Death of Art, New York, 1984, pp. 5-35.
Didi-Hubermann, G., Was wir sehen blickt uns an: Metapsychologie des Bildes, München, 2001.
Dvořák, M., "Einleitung", in: Pieter Bruegel der Ältere. Siebenunddreißig Farbenlichtdrucke nach seinen Hauptwerken in Wien und eine Einführung in seine Kunst, Wien, 1921, pp. 5-36.
Dvořák, M., "Pieter Bruegel der Ältere", in: K. M. Swoboda, J. Wilde, eds., Kunstgeschichte als Geistesgeschichte. Studien zur abendländischen Kunstentwicklung, München, 1924, pp. 217-257.
Dvořák, M., Idealism and Naturalism in Gothic Art, trans. R. J. Klawiter, Indiana, 1967.
Elkins, J., Visual Studies: A Skeptical Introduction, New York, 2003.
Gombrich, E., "Review of Charles de Tolnay on Hieronymus Bosch", The New York Review of Books, February 23rd, 1967, pp. 3-4.
Gombrich, E., "Review of Kunstgeschichte und Kunsttheorie im 19. Jahrhundert (Probleme der Kunstwissenschaft, I)", The Burlington Magazine, no. 46, 1964, pp. 418-420.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00043079.1964.10788781
Grossmann, F., Pieter Bruegel. Completed Edition of the Paintings, London, 1973.
Hofmann, W., "Fragen nach Strukturanalyse", in: Bruchlinien. Aufsätze zur Kunst des 19. Jahrhunderts, München, 1979, pp. 70-89.
Husserl, E., Phenomenology of Internal Time Consciousness, trans. J. Churchill, Indiana, 1964.
Lachnit, E., Die Wiener Schule der Kunstgeschichte und die Kunst ihrer Zeit: zum Verhältnis von
Methode und Forschungsgegenstand am Beginn der Moderne, Wien, 2005.
Männig, M., Hans Sedlmayrs Kunstgeschichte. Eine kritische Studie, Wien - Köln - Weimar, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.7788/9783412506957
Marchi, R., "Hans Tietze and art history as Geisteswissenschaft in early twentieth-century Vienna", Journal of Art Historiography, no. 5, 2011, https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/ marchi.pdf.
Marion, J. L., The Crossing of the Visible, Paolo Alto, 2004.
Moxey, K., Visual Time. The Image in History, Durham - London, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822395935
Murár, T. "Je-li umělecká forma vtělením duchovního vztahu ke světu. Max Dvořák a umění Pietra Bruegela staršího", Umění, no. 66, 2018, pp. 458-465.
Petříček, M. Filosofie en noir, Praha, 2018.
Pinder, W., "Zur Physiognomik des Mannierismus", in: H. Prinzhorn, ed., Die Wissenschaft am Scheideweg von Leben und Geist. Festschrift Klages zum 60. Geburtstag, Leipzig, 1932, pp. 148-156.
Rampley, M., "Max Dvořák. Art history and the crisis of Modernity", Art History, no. 26, 2003, pp. 214-237.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0141-6790.2003.02602010.x
Rampley, M., The Vienna School of Art History. Empire and the Politics of Scholarship, 1847-1918, Pennsylvania, 2013.
Sedlmayr, H., "Die Macchia Bruegels", Jahrbuch der Kunsthistorischen Sammlungen in Wien, no. 8, 1934, pp. 137-159.
Sedlmayr, H., "Zu einer strengen Kunstwissenschaft", Kunstwissenschaftliche Forschungen, 1931, no. 1, pp. 7-32.
Simmel, G., Schopenhauer and Nietzsche, trans. H. Loiskandl, D. Weinstein, M. Weinstein, Chicago, 1991.
Simmel, G., The View of Life. Four Metaphysical Essays with Journal Aphorisms, trans. J. A. Y. Andrews, D. N. Levine, Chicago, 2010.
https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226757858.001.0001
Tietze, H., Die Kunst in unserer Zeit, Wien, 1930.
Tietze, H., Lebendige Kunstwissenschaft, Wien, 1925.
Tietze, H., Max Dvořák, Der Piperbote für Kunst und Literatur, 1924, no. 1, pp. 4-8.
Tolnai, K., "Studien zu den Gemälden Pieter Bruegels d. Ä.", Jahrbuch der Kunsthistorischen Sammlungen in Wien, no. 8, 1934, pp. 105-135.
Tolnai, K., Die Zeichnungen Pieter Bruegels, München, 1925.
Tuinen S., "The Late and the New: Mannerism and Style in Art History and Philosophy", in: Art History after Deleuze and Guattari, eds. S. Tuinen, S. Zepke, Belgium, 2017, pp. 145-163.
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt21c4s51.11
Vojvodík, J., "A World of Purely Artistic Conception and a Universal Art of the Spirit: Max Dvořák and Karel Teige between Phenomenology and Surrealism", Word and Sense, no. 24, 2015, pp. 25-41.
Vojvodík, J., "'Fading, Fading...': Ztráta, vzkříšení a dějiny umění jako palingeneze: K uměleckohistorickému myšlení Maxe Dvořáka na pozadí fenomenologie jeho doby", in: Mizení. Fenomény, mediální praktiky a techniky na prahu zjevného, eds. K. Svatoňová, K. Krtilová, Praha, 2017, pp. 155-202.
Wendland U., ed., Biographisches Handbuch deutschsprachiger Kunsthistoriker im Exil. Leben und Werk der unter dem Nationalsozialismus verfolgten und vertriebenen Wissenschaftler, München, 1999.
Wiesing, L., Phänomene im Bild, München, 2007.
Wood, Ch., The Vienna School Reader. Politics and Art Historical Method in the 1930s, New York, 2000.
Inne artykuły z tego numeru
Contents
- Stanisław Ignacy Witkiewicz (1885–1939)Witkacy (1885–1939)Julia Margaret Cameron (1815–1879)portrait photographyclose-upPolish photographymodernity
‘Through a Microscope from a Telescopic Distance’: Witkacy, Cameron and the Photography of Faces
- Polish modern paintingself-portraittheory of self-representationmatter of paintingJózef Czapski (1896–1993)Zygmunt Waliszewski (1897–1936)Piotr Potworowski (1898–1964)Artur Nacht-Samborski (1898–1974)Jan Cybis (1897–1972)
Face Substances. The rhetoric of Kapists’ self-portraits: between self-reflection and confession
Podobne publikacje
Contents
- Stanisław Ignacy Witkiewicz (1885–1939)Witkacy (1885–1939)Julia Margaret Cameron (1815–1879)portrait photographyclose-upPolish photographymodernity
‘Through a Microscope from a Telescopic Distance’: Witkacy, Cameron and the Photography of Faces
- Polish modern paintingself-portraittheory of self-representationmatter of paintingJózef Czapski (1896–1993)Zygmunt Waliszewski (1897–1936)Piotr Potworowski (1898–1964)Artur Nacht-Samborski (1898–1974)Jan Cybis (1897–1972)
Face Substances. The rhetoric of Kapists’ self-portraits: between self-reflection and confession